By Alex Cohen-Smith
Congratulations to the Angels’ Mike Scioscia and Rockies’ Jim Tracy, the 2009 MLB Managers of the Year. Scioscia’s Angels, faced turmoil from the start, when pitcher Nick Adenhart was killed in a brutal car crash. The team recovered strong, even with their depleted rotation, and won the AL West with a record of 97-65. Tracy, on the other hand, didn’t take over managerial duties until late May from Clint Hurdle, and led the Rockies to a 74-42 and a Wild Card berth under his guidance.
So both these men are great managers now right? They’ve earned that title for the rest of their lives? I think not. The discussion on the Steiner Sports Facebook Page led me to take a deeper look at the current MLB managers. Take a look at these facts
- Of the 16 award winners in the last 10 years (Bobby Cox, Jack McKeon, Lou Pinella and Scioscia have won multiple times)
- Only 11 of these managers still have jobs, and only 7 of those are still managing the team with which they won the award on.
- Both 2007 winners, Eric Wedge and Bob Melvin, are currently jobless.
- Only two current managers, Bobby Cox and Tony LaRussa, have managed their current teams for at least 10 years.
- 21 of the 30 current managers starting managing their current teams in the past three years.
So ask yourself this question: Is being a good manager simply the product of being in a good system? I don’t think so. Take the current Yankees.
Yes they had an amazing team this year, but Joe Girardi is a great manager. For the most part, he managed his bullpen well, kept the team healthy for the majority of the season (most importantly, down the stretch) and didn’t succumb to the New York pressure.
He turned no-name guys like David Robertson and Phil Coke into steady relievers. He gave the ball the Damaso Marte, who had a 9.61 ERA during the regular season, in crucial situations, and he came through. Girardi stuck to his guns and had Jose Molina catch A.J. Burnett throughout the postseason, which may or may not have been the best move, but you can’t argue that it did keep the 36 year old Jorge Posada fresh. People can (and do) still hate on Girardi for not making the playoffs his first season, but it was the way the team played, not the managing, that did them in.
And don’t forget the job he did with the Marlins. Just take a look at lineup they had the before he came versus his first season:
In 2005, here’s who the Marlins had playing for them:
C: Paul LoDuca
1B: Carlos Delgado
2B: Luis Castillo
SS: Alex Gonzalez
3B: Mike Lowell
LF: Miguel Cabrera
CF: Juan Pierre
RF: Juan Encarnacion
Starters: Josh Beckett, Dontrelle Willis, Burnett, Al Leiter, Brian Moehler
Closer: Todd Jones
Here’s who they had in 2006:
C: Miguel Olivo
1B: Mike Jacobs (1st year with over 100 ABs)
2B: Dan Uggla (rookie)
SS: Hanley Ramirez (rookie)
3B: Miguel Cabrera
LF: Josh Willingham (rookie)
CF: Reggie Abercrombie (rookie)
RF: Jeremy Hermida (rookie)
Starters: Willis, Scott Olsen (rookie), Ricky Nolasco (rookie), Moehler, Josh Johnson (rookie)
Closer: Joe Borowski
That’s 5 rookie position players (plus Jacobs, who was basically a rookie, if not technically a rookie) and 3 rookie starters. a 78-84 record was unbelievable. They subtracted Beckett, Burnett, Delgado, Castillo, LoDuca, Lowell, Pierre and Encarnacion and were still in contention for a playoff spot deep into September. That was a masterful job of managing.
I tend to think being the manager of a baseball team is easier than any of the other major sports. There are no line changes in baseball. No plays to be called on 4th and 1. Football, where you need to make subs on almost every play, adjust to formations, sometime call the plays on both sides of the field….now that’s tough.
What do you think? Open forum folks.
Posted by Alex Cohen-Smith
Posted by Alex Cohen-Smith 

Posted by Jason Klein 


